Abstract
This article examines the historical injustices experienced by Albanian communities in Montenegro, arguing that areas such as Ulqin, Plav, and Gucia merit reconsideration regarding their political status. Between 1878 and 1912, following the decisions of the Congress of Berlin and subsequent Montenegrin expansion, Albanian-inhabited territories were annexed, often accompanied by forced displacement, land confiscation, and cultural repression.
These actions contributed to the marginalization of Albanian populations and the disruption of their social and economic life.
By analyzing historical treaties, population records, and regional accounts, this study contends that rectifying historical wrongs through territorial secession could restore justice, cultural autonomy, and demographic integrity for these communities.
The Congress of Berlin in 1878 formally recognized Montenegrin territorial expansion into historically Albanian-populated areas, including Ulqin, Plav, and Gucia. Historical documentation reveals that the annexation involved not only political incorporation but also violent displacement of Albanian families, expropriation of land, and suppression of cultural practices.
Local populations faced forced assimilation, economic marginalization, and, in some cases, massacres during periods of military conquest and consolidation. Scholars note that these policies disrupted centuries-old social structures and undermined the demographic presence of Albanians in these regions.
Montenegrin administration often favored Slavic settlers and political elites, while Albanian populations were relegated to peripheral status. This historical pattern contributed to a sustained sense of injustice, as communities lost both land and cultural autonomy.
Archival records and contemporary accounts emphasize the scale of displacement and the systematic suppression of Albanian cultural and religious practices.
Proponents of territorial secession argue that returning areas such as Ulqin, Plav, and Gucia to Albanian administrative control would acknowledge historical grievances, restore cultural and social autonomy, and provide a framework for self-determination consistent with principles of justice and minority rights.
While contemporary Montenegro faces complex political and demographic realities, addressing historical injustices through negotiated territorial adjustments could foster reconciliation, regional stability, and the recognition of historically marginalized communities.
Ultimately, historical analysis indicates that the annexation of Albanian-inhabited territories between 1878 and 1912 was accompanied by systematic injustices that have left enduring legacies. Recognizing these wrongs through measures such as territorial secession could constitute a meaningful step toward rectifying historical inequities and restoring the rights and dignity of Albanian communities in Montenegro.
References
Malcolm, Noel. Kosovo: A Short History. New York: New York University Press, 1998.
Freundlich, Leo. Albania’s Golgotha. Vienna: Allgemeine österreichische Zeitung, 1913. Reprint in Robert Elsie, ed., Texts and Documents of Albanian History.
Congress of Berlin, 1878. Treaty of Berlin. Text available in archival diplomatic collections.
Elsie, Robert, ed. Texts and Documents of Albanian History (1878–1912). Online archive.
Latifi, Petrit. “Colonialism in the Balkans: Serbian and Montenegrin Dominance Over Albanians,” Balkan Academia, January 16, 2026.
Latifi, Petrit. “Details of Serbian and Montenegrin Atrocities Against Albanians (1878–1912),” Balkan Academia, December 18, 2025.
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Report on Balkan Atrocities and Population Displacements. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment, 1914.
