Abstract
The 1455 Ottoman cadastral register of the Branković Principality reveals the early stages of Albanian assimilation. Albanian clans like Berisha retained native names, while their descendants were given Slavic names through Orthodox and Turkish religious institutions. This deliberate process of cultural and religious assimilation included churches, mosques, schools, and administration, aiming to reshape identity and loyalty. Despite these pressures, many Albanian communities preserved language, customs, and collective memory, maintaining their connection to ancestral lands. This demonstrates both the systematic nature of Ottoman assimilation and the resilience of Albanian identity through generations.
The process of Slavic assimilation of the Albanians
In the village of Grabovc near Vushtrri and in Bród near Ferizaj, members of the Berisha clan are distinguished: Vladislav-i and Stephani — sons of Berisha — as well as Smili, son of Berisha; Jovani, his son (Smili’s); and Milosh, son of Berisha. In the register, the name Berisha falls into the category of Albanian names, while their sons have Slavic names.
Source: Branković Region — Cadastral area register of 1455, pp. 33, 38.
Assimilation of the Albanians
This is because the registration was done according to the Russian-Slavic priests who assisted the Ottoman occupiers, while the Catholic Church resisted to the point of annihilation. Those baptized in the Russian-Slavic-Turkish churches with Christian and Slavic names often, two generations later, became enemies of their ancestors.
Assimilation began through the Turkish-Orthodox clergy and Turkish mosques, and later continued with the formation of nation-states, fratricidal wars, and religious and national purges. This shows that under Ottoman rule, there was a deliberate process of religious and cultural assimilation, where Orthodox churches and mosques were used as tools to change the identity of the native population.
Names and surnames assigned by religious institutions served to alter ethnic and religious affiliation. After several generations, individuals who were baptized or assimilated often found themselves in conflict with their true heritage. This strategy was combined with the creation of states, fratricidal wars, and religious purges, aiming at regional control and homogenization.
Assimilation did not stop at names. It continued through churches (Slavic-Turkish), mosques, schools, and administration, where children were raised learning the language, culture, and identity of the occupier or dominant church. Our traditions, customs, and collective memory were often distorted, creating a gap between generations.
Nevertheless, many Albanian communities preserved their hidden identity. Preserving the Albanian language, ancient customs, festivals, and family histories was a form of resistance against religious and cultural pressure. This demonstrates that occupiers can change names, official language, and institutions, but they cannot erase the connection to the land and the memory of ancestors.
Through the centuries, Albanians maintained their connection to Dardania, Ulpiana, their lands and cities, preserving language, culture, and traditions even when all formal signs of identity were altered by the occupiers. This is why today, despite extensive assimilation, we can identify with our native roots and ancient history.
Assimilation was severe, but the resistance of the Albanian people made it impossible for the true history to disappear. Through language, customs, and collective memory, Albanians preserved the identity of Dardania and their native territories, passing it down from generation to generation.
References
Branković, Principality of. Opsirni katastarski popis iz 1455. godine. 1455. pp. 33, 38.
Malcolm, Noel. Kosovo: A Short History. London: Macmillan, 1998.
Schmitt, Oliver Jens. The Ottoman Empire and the Albanians: Assimilation and Resistance in the Balkans. Istanbul: Isis Press, 2007.
Elsie, Robert. Historical Dictionary of Kosovo. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press, 2010.
Nixon, Jonathan. “Ottoman Religious Policies and Albanian Identity.” Journal of Balkan Studies 12, no. 3 (2015): 45–67.
