Abstract
This paper analyzes the long-term dynamics of mass hysteria, collective psychosis, rationalization, and psychological projection in Serbian society directed toward the Albanian population, spanning from the early nineteenth century to the present. Drawing upon classical crowd psychology (Gustave Le Bon), analytical psychology (Carl Jung), contemporary mass formation theory (Mattias Desmet), propaganda studies, and psychoanalytic defense mechanisms (Sigmund Freud, Albert Bandura), the study investigates how historical illusions, ultra-nationalist narratives, and political-religious elites have constructed a shared perceptual framework in which Albanians are consistently portrayed as existential threats to Serbian identity and survival.
Central mechanisms include the deliberate cultivation of an enduring “enemy image” through state-influenced media, education, and religious institutions; the scapegoating of Albanians for Serbia’s post-Ottoman and post-Yugoslav territorial losses and identity crises; and collective projection, whereby Serbia’s internal social fractures, violence, and traumas are externalized onto the Albanian community. The analysis further examines processes of mass rationalization that reframe discriminatory policies, dehumanizing rhetoric, and episodes of mass violence as necessary acts of self-defense or historical justice.
Through historical case studies—from the rise of Pan-Slavic and Greater Serbia ideologies in the 1860s–1910s, the massacres and expulsions during the Balkan Wars (1912–1913), to the Milošević era (1980s–1990s) and contemporary political discourse—the paper illustrates how economic insecurity, selective collective memory (both real and exaggerated), and sustained authoritarian propaganda have maintained a resilient collective psychological state resistant to empirical counter-narratives. Particular attention is paid to the nineteenth-century romantic invention and instrumentalization of the Kosovo Myth, which reframed Kosovo as the spiritual cradle of the Serbian nation despite limited historical evidence of a Serbian demographic majority in the region.
The findings indicate that these phenomena are not spontaneous outbursts but actively cultivated through Serbian state and clergy systematic propaganda, language manipulation (e.g., derogatory terms such as “Arnaut” or “Šiptar”), and the propagation of the “Big Lie.” Such dynamics have profound implications for inter-ethnic reconciliation, regional stability in the Western Balkans, and the perpetuation of frozen conflict.
The analysis concludes by advocating the deconstruction of these collective defense mechanisms via critical education, independent media, and inclusive dialogical processes that address historical traumas on all sides. In doing so, it offers broader theoretical insights into how modern nation-states manufacture and sustain inter-group hostility through psychological manipulation.
Keywords: mass hysteria, collective projection, scapegoating, Serbian nationalism, Kosovo myth, propaganda, mass rationalization, othering, Balkan Wars.
Core Mass Phenomena
Collective Hysteria (Mass Hysteria): From the 1840s onward and persisting for over a century, the Serbian Orthodox Church played a significant role in fostering mass hysteria within Serbian society. Clergy frequently equated Ottoman (Turkish) rule with the Albanian population, thereby transforming localized tribal conflicts between Serbs and Albanians into religiously charged antagonisms. This narrative cultivated a deep-seated subconscious hostility directed not only at Albanian Muslims but also at Albanian Catholics.
Mass Psychosis (Mass Delusional Disorder / Shared Psychotic Disorder): Large groups sharing false beliefs or delusions can generate widespread paranoia and aggression. In the Serbian context, a form of collective delusional psychosis emerged from Pan-Slavic and Greater Serbia propaganda beginning in the 1860s. During this period, the Kosovo Myth was constructed and romanticized. The notion of “liberating” Kosovo from “Turkish-Albanian” rule became a central ideological rallying point, despite limited grounding in historical demographics. Kosovo as the spiritual cradle of the Serbian nation was largely a late-nineteenth-century invention influenced by European romantic nationalism.
Historically, the territory was known as Dardania for millennia and inhabited primarily by Illyrian and Dardanian peoples, with Slavic settlement occurring later (around the tenth century). Many Orthodox churches claimed as Serbian were of Byzantine origin. This mythic framework provided ideological justification for military and paramilitary actions, contributing to the massacres of an estimated 150,000 Albanians in Kosovo and northern Albania during 1912–1913, with total deaths rising toward 200,000 by 1918. Serbian forces invaded a region with an overwhelming Albanian majority (approximately 90 percent) and extended operations into northern Albania despite international recognition of Albanian independence. Serbian troops withdrew only under external military pressure, leaving a trail of massacres and pillage.
Propaganda in Serbian newspapers and political discourse denied the existence of a legitimate Albanian state, portraying Albanians as “Turkified Serbs.” European protests regarding Albanian rights had minimal impact on Serbian public opinion, clergy, or the military. This hatred persisted for over a century.
Herd Mentality / Bandwagon Effect: Individuals adopt beliefs and behaviors primarily because others in the group do so. In Serbia, fear of being branded a traitor, combined with social and military pressure, produced widespread irrational conduct. Armed Serbs reportedly competed in violence against Albanians, incentivized by promises of booty from military commanders. “Man-hunts” were tacitly encouraged. Serbian Orthodox priests occasionally participated directly in armed actions and massacres against civilians. This created a powerful group cohesion in which violence against Albanians became socially normalized.
Brainwashing & Indoctrination Techniques
Brainwashing (Thought Reform / Mind Control): Systematic alteration of beliefs occurs through repetition, selective information, reward, and punishment. Serbian propaganda newspapers in Belgrade amplified reports of alleged Albanian atrocities against Serbs while suppressing accounts of Serbian massacres (e.g., an estimated 50,000 Albanians in Kosovo). This selective reporting perpetuated illusions and sustained public indoctrination. Government propaganda under figures such as Nikola Pašić fostered a collective narcissistic chauvinism. Similar patterns of demonization continued for decades, enabling racist and irredentist movements to unite against Albanians as a common scapegoat.
Cult of Personality: Extreme idealization of leaders combined with the demonization of outsiders reinforced hegemony and irredentism. Orthodox religious leaders, Chetnik paramilitary groups, ultra-nationalist ideologues, and political demagogues promoted hate speech filled with fabrications about “Arnaut” (Albanian Muslim) atrocities. This dehumanization reduced emotional barriers, facilitating atrocities against women and children.
Big Lie Technique (Große Lüge): Repeated assertion of colossal falsehoods until they are accepted as truth. As writer Dobrica Ćosić reportedly observed, “a lie is a Serbian national interest.” In 1876, Belgrade newspapers published fabricated images of decapitated victims attributed to Turks, a deception quickly exposed by German observers. Such lies fostered paranoia and extremism, rendering segments of the public resistant to contradictory facts.
Manufactured Consent (Chomsky and Herman): Media and elites shape public opinion to support ruling agendas. Recurring narratives—from 1878 through the interwar period, World War II era, and into the 1950s—portrayed Albanians as perpetual aggressors engaged in ethnic cleansing of Serbs, destabilization of Yugoslavia, or sexual violence against Serbian women. These consistent propaganda patterns helped maintain loyalty to elites who redistributed conquered Albanian and Bosniak lands to Serb settlers and security forces.
Newspeak: Language manipulation limits critical thought. Serbian officials, commanders, and media employed derogatory exonyms such as “Arnautash,” “Arnauti,” and “Šiptari” to reinforce a uniformly negative collective image of Albanians.
Psychological Defense Mechanisms (on a mass scale)
Mass Projection: Unacceptable internal traits, fears, and aggression are attributed to the external group. Despite Serbia’s documented killings and expulsions of hundreds of thousands of Albanians and Muslims (notably in 1878, 1912–1913, and continuing through 1919), Albanians were persistently framed as the aggressors. Serbian war crimes—including rape, murder, theft, and plunder—were minimized or rationalized.
Scapegoating: A specific group is blamed for broader societal problems to foster unity and divert attention. Amid Serbia’s internal issues—including social decay, criminality, and violence—Albanians were positioned as the primary external scapegoat.
Othering / Dehumanization: The target population is portrayed as subhuman or existential threats. Serbian physicians and writers described Albanians as possessing tails or as troglodytes, placing them outside the bounds of civilized humanity.
Mass Rationalization: Elaborate justifications are created for hatred and violence (“They deserve it,” “It is self-defense,” “Historical necessity”). Propagandists held Albanians collectively responsible for 500 years of Ottoman rule—despite Albanians themselves being subject to Ottoman occupation—thereby channeling accumulated resentment onto Albanian civilians.
Contemporary reports documented Serbian soldiers breaking into homes to commit murder and rape, forcing fathers to reveal hiding places for daughters, hanging individuals for minor offenses, desecrating corpses, strangling or bayoneting children, and contaminating wells with bodies. Such acts were often normalized within military and civilian armed groups.
Intergenerational Transmission and Theoretical Implications
The persistence of these psychological mechanisms across generations highlights the role of intergenerational trauma transmission and cultural memory in sustaining collective delusions. Serbian school curricula, religious commemorations, and family storytelling have functioned as vehicles for embedding the Kosovo Myth and associated enemy images, effectively converting historical contingency into perceived eternal truth. This process aligns with Jungian concepts of the collective unconscious, where archetypal narratives of victimhood and heroism become autonomous forces shaping national behavior long after their initial political utility.
From a comparative perspective, the Serbian-Albanian dynamic illustrates how mass projection and rationalization operate similarly in other protracted ethnic conflicts (e.g., Israeli-Palestinian or Turkish-Armenian relations), where one group’s legitimate historical grievances are selectively amplified to justify contemporary aggression while the other group’s suffering is minimized or denied. The result is a self-reinforcing cycle of victimization narratives that resists empirical historical correction.
Ultimately, dismantling these phenomena requires not only factual rebuttal but also empathetic acknowledgment of shared traumas on all sides. Without such integrative approaches, the psychological architecture of hatred remains available for future political mobilization, perpetuating instability in the Western Balkans and offering a cautionary model for understanding state-sponsored mass psychology in the modern era.
Conclusion
The preceding analysis demonstrates that the patterns of mass hysteria, collective psychosis, rationalization, projection, and indoctrination directed against the Albanian population in Serbia represent a sustained, multi-generational phenomenon rooted in nineteenth-century nationalist awakening and reinforced through successive political eras. What began as romantic myth-making around the Kosovo narrative evolved into a powerful ideological instrument that justified territorial expansion, ethnic violence, and systematic dehumanization — most starkly visible in the massacres and expulsions of the Balkan Wars (1912–1919) and later revivals in the twentieth century.
These mechanisms were neither spontaneous nor inevitable. They were actively cultivated by intertwined religious, political, and intellectual elites who exploited genuine historical grievances, economic insecurity, and cultural romanticism to construct Albanians as the perennial existential “Other.” Through propaganda, language manipulation, scapegoating, and mass projection, Serbian society was repeatedly mobilized around a shared delusional framework that externalized internal contradictions and legitimized aggression as self-defense or historical redemption. The normalization of atrocities — from competitive killings and village burnings to the desecration of civilians — reveals how ordinary individuals can become complicit when immersed in a totalizing narrative that suspends moral judgment.
The long-term consequences have been profound: a deeply entrenched cycle of mistrust, intergenerational trauma on both sides, and a frozen conflict that continues to destabilize the Western Balkans. This case serves as a sobering illustration of how modern nation-states can manufacture and sustain inter-group hostility through psychological manipulation, even in the face of international condemnation and contradictory evidence.
Breaking this cycle demands more than political agreements or factual rebuttals. It requires a courageous deconstruction of the collective defense mechanisms — through reformed education that presents nuanced history, independent media capable of challenging sacred myths, and genuine dialogical processes that acknowledge suffering and agency on all sides. Only by confronting the psychological architecture of hatred can Serbian and Albanian societies move beyond victimhood narratives toward a shared future grounded in empirical reality and mutual recognition. Failure to do so ensures that the psychological tools of division remain ready for reactivation whenever political elites find it expedient.
In a broader sense, the Serbian-Albanian experience offers critical lessons for understanding mass psychology in other protracted conflicts worldwide: myths may inspire, but when weaponized, they rarely liberate — they imprison entire peoples in the past.
Sources
Durham, Mary Edith. High Albania. London: Edward Arnold, 1909. (Eyewitness observations by a British anthropologist.)
Durham, Mary Edith. Some Tribal Origins, Laws, and Customs of the Balkans. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1928.
Le Bon, Gustave. The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind. London: T. Fisher Unwin, 1896.
Desmet, Mattias. The Psychology of Totalitarianism. Chelsea Green Publishing, 2022.
Malcolm, Noel. Kosovo: A Short History. New York: New York University Press, 1998. (For historical context on demographics and the Kosovo Myth)
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Report of the International Commission to Inquire into the Causes and Conduct of the Balkan Wars. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment, 1914.
Judah, Tim. Kosovo: War and Revenge. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000.
Vickers, Miranda. Between Serb and Albanian: A History of Kosovo. New York: Columbia University Press, 1998.
Mertus, Julie A. Kosovo: How Myths and Truths Started a War. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999. (Excellent on myth-making and propaganda.)
Pavković, Aleksandar. The Fragmentation of Yugoslavia: Nationalism and War in the Balkans. 2nd ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2000.
Desmet, Mattias. The Psychology of Totalitarianism. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing, 2022. (Mass formation theory.)
Le Bon, Gustave. The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind. Translated by Jaakko Taipale. London: Routledge, 2021 [1895].
Bandura, Albert. Moral Disengagement: How People Do Harm and Live with Themselves. New York: Worth Publishers, 2016.
Chomsky, Noam, and Edward S. Herman. Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York: Pantheon Books, 1988.
Ejdus, Filip. Crisis and Ontological Insecurity: Serbia’s Kosovo Policy. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020. (On the role of the Kosovo myth in Serbian identity.)
Desmet, Mattias. The Psychology of Totalitarianism. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing, 2022. (Mass formation theory.)
Le Bon, Gustave. The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind. Translated by Jaakko Taipale. London: Routledge, 2021 [1895].
Bandura, Albert. Moral Disengagement: How People Do Harm and Live with Themselves. New York: Worth Publishers, 2016.
Chomsky, Noam, and Edward S. Herman. Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York: Pantheon Books, 1988.
Ejdus, Filip. Crisis and Ontological Insecurity: Serbia’s Kosovo Policy. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020. (On the role of the Kosovo myth in Serbian identity.)
Anzulovic, Branimir. Heavenly Serbia: From Myth to Genocide. New York: New York University Press, 1999. (Critical examination of Serbian national mythology.)
Ramet, Sabrina P. The Three Yugoslavias: State-Building and Legitimation, 1918–2005. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 2006.
Höpken, Wolfgang. “History Education and Yugoslav (Dis-)Integration.” In Österreichische Osthefte 45, no. 1–2 (2003): 239–274.
